There are mainly 4 revenue settlement models of mining pool : PPLNS, PPS, PPS, and FPPS.
PPLNS stands for Pay Per Last N Shares. The specific distribution plan is that when a new block is dug, the mining pool deducts the handling fee first, and then distributes all the remaining revenue (including blockchain rewards and miner fees) to each miner according to the calculation power ratio.
The full name of PPS is Pay Per Share. According to the proportion of miners' computing power in the mining pool, estimate the output that can be obtained every day in the mining pool, that is, assume that the lucky value is 100% of the theoretical income. After deducting the mining pool handling fee, the miners are given a basically fixed income every day.
This allocation model is a bit like working for a mining pool boss, you give him money. The returns are relatively stable, and the risks are also borne by the boss. But the boss will not take this risk in vain, and the miners have a price. For example, the miner fee (transaction fee) will not be given to you. Therefore, under the PPS model, the income is relatively stable. But the long-term benefits will generally be less than the PPLNS model.
PPS + mode
The full name of PPS is Pay Per Shares Plus. It can be seen as a combination of PPS and PPLNS models. Both the block rewards are settled according to the theoretical number of blocks in the mining pool, and the miner fees are based on the actual mining power obtained by the actual explosion of the pool. Proportionate distribution.
This distribution model increases the distribution of miner fees on the basis of stable income. It is also a more mainstream distribution model.
The full name of FPPS is Full Pay Per Shares. It can be regarded as a complete PPS, and both the block reward and the miner's fee are settled according to the theoretical income. Since we want to pursue stability, we must follow through. Compared with PPLNS, the biggest difference is the theoretical and actual returns.
Several settlement methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. The current mainstream settlement method is FPPS. At the same time, the pursuit of stability will also pay some costs, such as high rates.
Weminer has reached strategic cooperation with the world's top computing power mining pools to provide professional, reliable and safe computing power sharing services for global investors.
By adopting the FPPS model (full name: Full Pay Per Shares, block rewards and miner fees are settled according to theoretical income), the income of the computing power package purchased and leased by the investor in the micro-mine is not subject to power outage and maintenance at the mine, and the mining machine is regularly The impact of maintenance will maximize the investor's mining income, which is 5% -8% higher than the original income.